Current:Home > MarketsNYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots -Wealth Empowerment Zone
NYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots
View
Date:2025-04-13 23:19:51
NEW YORK – The city agreed Friday to pay $17.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged police officers forced two women to remove hijabs while mugshot photos were being taken, lawyers for the women said Friday.
The case, filed in 2018, stemmed from the arrests of Muslim American women Jamilla Clark and Arwa Aziz. In court records, they alleged New York City Police officers threatened them to remove their headscarves, and the two felt ashamed after being forced to do so.
New York City:NYPD officer shot, killed during traffic stop in Queens by suspect with prior arrests
“When they forced me to take off my hijab, I felt as if I were naked,” Clark said in a statement released by her lawyers and advocates. “I’m not sure if words can capture how exposed and violated I felt.”
The settlement announced Friday still requires approval by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in federal court in New York.
Clark and Aziz’s attorney, O. Andrew F. Wilson, said forcing someone to remove religious clothing is akin to a strip search. The women alleged the removal of their hijabs for booking photographs violated their First Amendment rights, as well as federal religious protections and state law.
“This is a milestone for New Yorkers’ privacy and religious rights,”said Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, a civil rights group that provided legal representation for the plaintiffs. “The NYPD should never have stripped these religious New Yorkers of their head coverings and dignity. This wasn’t just an assault on their rights, but on everything our city claims to believe in."
In 2020, the New York City Police Department changed its policy as a response to the lawsuit, allowing people to be photographed with religious garb as long as their faces weren’t covered, the New York Times reported. Advocates supporting the lawsuit said the NYPD has practiced a policy of keeping mugshots as part of its facial recognition surveillance program.
The agreement maintains the city denied engaging in a pattern or process that deprived people of their protected rights, court records said. The city didn’t admit to the specific claims made by Clark and Aziz.
Nick Paolucci, a spokesperson for the New York City Law Department, said the resolution was in the best interest of all parties.
“This settlement resulted in a positive reform for the NYPD,” he said in a statement. “The agreement carefully balances the department’s respect for firmly held religious beliefs with the important law enforcement need to take arrest photos.”
Criminal justice:New York City police have to track the race of people they stop. Will others follow suit?
Clark and Aziz both wore hijabs in line with their Muslim faith, which covers a woman’s hair, ears and neck, but leaves her face exposed. Many observant Muslim women wear it at all times when they’re in the presence of men who aren’t part of their immediate family.
In January 2017, Clark said she wept with her hijab down around her shoulders at NYPD headquarters in Manhattan, and begged to put it back on, court records said. She said she had been arrested for violating an order of protection by her ex-husband, which she said was false.
Eight months later, in August, Aziz had her photo taken with her hijab at her neck, in a Brooklyn precinct after voluntarily turning herself over to NYPD for violating a protective order against her sister-in-law that she said she didn’t commit. She, too, cried during the photos that had to be taken in front of several male NYPD officers and over 30 men incarcerated, according to court records.
As part of the agreement, the city prepared a class list of people who had their religious head covering removed for an official NYPD photo, according to court records. Attorneys estimate the proposed settlement could make over 3,600 people eligible for payments between approximately $7,000 and $13,000. They encouraged anyone who had their head coverings removed for a mugshot between March 16, 2014 and Aug. 23, 2021 to also file.
“We send our appreciation to the Muslim women who bravely persisted with this litigation, prompting policy change that benefit many with similar religious garb requirements,” Afar Nasher, executive director of the civil rights group Council on American-Islamic Relations New York chapter, said in a statement.
Notices of the settlement would go out to people identified in police records. Information would be available in English and also in Arabic, Bengali, Spanish, Urdu and Hebrew.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Archaeologists in Chile race against time, climate change to preserve ancient mummies
- Florida teen bitten by a shark during a lifeguard training camp
- The 2025 Toyota Camry SE sprinkles sporty affordability over new all-hybrid lineup
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- As Hurricane Beryl Surged Toward Texas, Scientists Found Human-Driven Warming Intensified Its Wind and Rain
- What time does 'The Bachelorette' start? Premiere date, cast, where to watch 'historic' Season 21
- Copa America 2024 Bracket: Canada, Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia remain for semifinals
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Early Amazon Prime Day Deals: Get 68% Off Matching Sets That Will Get You Outfit Compliments All Summer
Ranking
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Hatch recalls nearly 1 million power adapters sold with baby sound machines due to shock hazard
- Bloomberg Philanthropies gifting $1 billion to medical school, others at John Hopkins University
- United Airlines flight loses wheel after takeoff from Los Angeles and lands safely in Denver
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Opponents of Louisiana’s Ten Commandments law want judge to block it before new school year starts
- Moulin Rouge's iconic windmill sails restored after collapse just in time for the Olympics
- Who is Emma Navarro? Meet the American who advanced to the Wimbledon quarterfinals
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
American citizen working for drone company injured in Israel
Hurricane Beryl makes landfall along Texas coast as Category 1 storm | The Excerpt
Temporary worker drop may be signaling slowing economy
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
'Bluey' and beyond: TV shows for little kids parents love (and some we hate)
All rail cars carrying hazardous material have been removed from North Dakota derailment site
Teen safely stops runaway boat speeding in circles on New Hampshire’s largest lake