Current:Home > ScamsSeattle hospital sues Texas AG for demanding children's gender-affirming care records -Wealth Empowerment Zone
Seattle hospital sues Texas AG for demanding children's gender-affirming care records
View
Date:2025-04-12 12:24:54
A Seattle hospital filed suit against the Texas attorney general's office in an escalating battle over gender-affirming care for children that now crosses state lines, according to court records.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's office is seeking to force Seattle Children's Hospital to hand over medical records of Texas residents who might have received gender-affirming care at the facility, prompting the action by the hospital this month.
The attorney general's consumer protections division is investigating the hospital and its physicians for possible violations of a Texas provision that include "misrepresentations regarding Gender Transitioning Treatments and Procedures and Texas law," the office said in subpoenas issued to the hospital.
The subpoenas, issued Nov. 17, demand that the hospital provide records about minor Texas residents treated anytime beginning Jan. 1, 2022, including details about gender-related issues and care.
The demands are part of a yearslong effort by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Paxton and the state GOP to eliminate gender-affirming care for minors in the state, which in some cases has driven families with transgender children to move to states such as Washington.
Gender-affirming care measures that are legal for minors in Washington — including puberty blockers, hormone therapy and certain surgeries — became illegal in Texas in September after the Legislature passed Senate Bill 14. Long before that law went into effect, Abbott ordered Child Protective Services to investigate families of transgender children reported to be receiving puberty blockers or hormone therapy.
More:Austin parents move to Seattle to give transgender daughter a better life
The hospital is arguing that Texas courts and officials don't have jurisdiction to subpoena the Washington-based health care system, according to a Dec. 7 complaint filed in Travis County, Texas.
Seattle Children's does not provide gender-affirming care in Texas or administer such care via telemedicine to patients in the state, the hospital's filing states, and it does not advertise its gender-affirming treatments in Texas. Its only employees in Texas are remote administrative workers, not clinicians.
The lawsuit also argues that the attorney general's subpoena would require the hospital and its associates to break federal privacy laws restricting the release of medical records as well as Washington's "Shield Law," which prevents reproductive and gender care providers from cooperating with out-of-state efforts to pursue criminal and civil penalties.
In the filing, the hospital said the demands for records "represent an unconstitutional attempt to investigate and chill potential interstate commerce and travel for Texas residents seeking care in another state."
The hospital asked the court to block Paxton's request or, barring that, to limit the scope of the information requested in the subpoena.
Seattle Children's said through a spokesperson that it is protecting private patient information and complying with the law for all the health care services it provides.
The attorney general's office issued the subpoenas less than two months after SB 14 went into effect in Texas, prohibiting doctors from providing certain gender-affirming medical treatments to minors experiencing gender dysphoria, a condition in which a person’s gender identity doesn’t match their sex assigned at birth.
Paxton began investigating an Austin-based children's medical center in May over possible violations of state law or misrepresentations related to gender transition-related care. His subpoenas of Seattle Children's suggest he might be expanding the investigation to other hospitals.
The attorney general's office did not respond to repeated requests for comment Friday.
veryGood! (77186)
Related
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Battered and Flooded by Increasingly Severe Weather, Kentucky and Tennessee Have a Big Difference in Forecasting
- Fox News Reveals New Host Taking Over Tucker Carlson’s Time Slot
- Death of intellectually disabled inmate at Virginia prison drawing FBI scrutiny, document shows
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Got a question for Twitter's press team? The answer will be a poop emoji
- Biden’s Pick for the EPA’s Top Air Pollution Job Finds Himself Caught in the Crossfire
- Apple iPad Flash Deal: Save 30% on a Product Bundle With Accessories
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Turning Trash to Natural Gas: Utilities Fight for Their Future Amid Climate Change
Ranking
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Tom Holland Reveals the DIY Project That Helped Him Win Zendaya's Heart
- Stanford University president to resign following research controversy
- Thawing Permafrost has Damaged the Trans-Alaska Pipeline and Poses an Ongoing Threat
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Judge says he plans to sentence gynecologist who sexually abused patients to 20 years in prison
- Inside Clean Energy: The Coast-to-Coast Battle Over Rooftop Solar
- 3 women killed, baby wounded in shooting at Tulsa apartment
Recommendation
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Consent farms enabled billions of illegal robocalls, feds say
Special counsel's office contacted former Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey in Trump investigation
Pollution from N.C.’s Commercial Poultry Farms Disproportionately Harms Communities of Color
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
Judge to decide in April whether to delay prison for Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes
SAG actors are striking but there are still projects they can work on. Here are the rules of the strike.
Is it Time for the World Court to Weigh in on Climate Change?